A total of 41 participants (29%) described brand new affordances of your software to explain as to the reasons they ghosted other people. Specific known the convenience out-of ghosting (n = 32). They explained it are simpler than simply actually rejecting someone else given the anonymity provided by brand new software in addition to proven fact that there’s zero mutual social networking. Other people said it deleted this new application which means that deleted all of their conversations and you may connectivity (n = 9). Eventually, some participants together with said that the new excess of prospective couples afforded by relationship app’s accessibility a massive matchmaking pond contributed these to ghost anyone else these were quicker searching for (n = 5).
Zero responsibility to communicate (n = 31; 22%)
A larger gang of respondents (n = 29) announced it failed to are obligated to pay one another something hence ghosting falls under mobile matchmaking application use, which is linked to the idea of cellular relationship ideologies because the earlier told me. As the Melanie (27, heterosexual) explains: “I don’t are obligated to pay each other a reason due to the fact I failed to see this person face-to-face.” At the same time, a couple participants struggled towards the simple fact that its reasons for rejecting the other person just weren’t obvious. It therefore checked more comfortable for these to ghost in the place of in order to have fun with a direct break up method because this would want giving the other person a conclusion.
Concern on other
Privately rejecting anybody else isn’t easy and specific ghosters (n = 23; 16%) failed to have to damage one another from the vocally rejecting her or him. 
Altogether, 21 participants observed it as getting far more incredibly dull to explain to the other person as to why it declined them (elizabeth.g., maybe not glamorous/fascinating adequate) instead of to only ghost the other person. Likewise, around three respondents said it ghosted while they didn’t need certainly to deceive the other person of the leading them on the and faking notice.
To complement the qualitative findings on why respondents ghost, we conducted a logistic regression (see Table 1) to examine H1 and to explore which demographic and situational variables explain who ghosts. The overall model was significant, ? 2 (7) = , p < 0.001, Cox and Snell R 2 = .17, and Nagelkerke R 2 = .23 and the model fit was good, Hosmer and Lemeshow test, ? 2 (8) = 6.57, p = .584. As expected, dating app frequency in the past 31 days was a significant predictor of ghosting others (B = ?.26*). However, contrarily to our expectations for H1, the frequency of dating app use decreased the likelihood of ghosting others: For every step decrease in dating app use, the odds to ghost increased with 1.30. Interestingly, gender was not a significant predictor of having ghosted, which means that the odds for women to ghost other dating app users are not significantly higher than the odds for men. Contrarily, age was a significant predictor of having ghosted others on dating apps. For every year decrease in age, the odds to ghost increased with 1.08. Participants' perceptions of others' ghosting experiences (both in terms of ghosting others and being ghosted by others) were not significantly associated with the likelihood to ghost. Similarly, having been ghosted by other dating app users was not significantly associated with the likelihood to ghost others, yet this could be because only 18 respondents were in the category that never experienced ghosting compared to 153 respondents in the category that had been ghosted.
When considering the emotional solutions respondents was required to ghosting, the majority of participants (n = 86) advertised impact sad otherwise damage following the ghosting feel. Almost every other commonly mentioned ideas had been feeling frustrated (n = 65) and effect upset otherwise disillusioned (letter = 48). The second might be illustrated because of the Lennert’s (25, homosexual) experience: “I wanted to think inside the matchmaking so terribly, but I’m beginning to matter it more often than once. In my opinion some one you need significantly more degree about it, it spoils the person dating and helps to create invisible agendas.” Once the not totally all participants quickly know that they had become ghosted, many including stated these were worried while they believed something bad had taken place into the ghoster (letter = 16). 7 respondents noticed ashamed that they were ghosted, whereas four believed relieved which they was indeed ghosted since this is a very clear indication one another wasn’t a good fit. Ultimately, 28 participants explicitly stated that they had little to no psychological response on the ghosting experience.
